AI drafts every post and page from your papers and data. A person on our team reviews and edits it, and you approve everything before it goes out.
Nobody in a lab was hired to run a content calendar. The work is interesting. Writing about it well is a separate job, and it keeps losing to the actual job.
We work the way a good collaborator does: read the material, ask when something is ambiguous, and never oversell a result you'd have to walk back.
We read the manuscript, the methods and the limitations, not just the abstract, and write posts that hold up if a reviewer reads them. Written per platform, not one caption pasted three times.
A full redesign when the site is slow or dated, or ongoing updates so it stops looking like it was last touched two grant cycles ago. You approve the direction before anything gets built.
You send the manuscript. We return posts written for each platform's register, not the same paragraph pasted four times, and you approve them in one place.
Fragmented sleep degraded consolidation in a spatial-memory task despite matched total sleep time. Recordings showed reduced sharp-wave ripple density during the first post-training rest period…
Sleep isn't downtime for memory. It's the shift when the work gets done.
Our new paper shows that fragmenting sleep in mice, without shortening it, still measurably weakens how the hippocampus consolidates what was learned that day. Total hours slept looked normal. The consolidation did not.
The practical read: studies that track sleep duration alone may be missing the variable that matters.
Full paper linked below. Happy to talk methods with anyone working on this.
New from the lab 🧵
We broke sleep into fragments without shortening it. Mice slept the same number of hours and still consolidated memory worse.
Duration was never the whole story. Continuity is doing real work.
1/6
Same hours of sleep. Worse memory. 🧠
Our latest paper found that interrupted sleep weakens memory consolidation even when total sleep time stays the same, which means counting hours may be missing the point.
Swipe for the three figures that convinced us, and the one that didn't.
A paper, a preprint, figures, or a note about what happened this week. There is no intake form to fight.
AI drafts from your source material for each platform you're on. A person on our team checks the science and the voice before you ever see it.
One screen shows every draft as it will appear on the feed. Approve it, or ask for a change in a sentence.
Approved posts get published on schedule, and you get a digest of what went live and how it did.
Every client gets a private workspace branded to their own lab. Drafts appear as they will look on the feed, you approve or ask for a change, and the studio picks it up from there.
Tell us what your lab is working on. We'll say plainly what consistent posts and a site that keeps up would look like, and what it would cost.